
Students from 23 Law Schools Nationwide Argued Child Welfare, Adoption Law in Moot Court CompetitionFebruary 23, 2007
Law students from across the country presented legal arguments at the National Moot Court Competition in Child Welfare and Adoption Law, February 16 & 17, at the Ohio Statehouse and the Ohio Judicial Center, home of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Capital University Law School’s National Center for Adoption Law and Policy, along with its Moot Court Board, partnered with four prominent child advocacy organizations to host the second annual competition. Twenty-three teams from throughout the country participated. The final round of judges was composed of leaders from:
Students from 23 law schools nationwide presented arguments on issues pertaining to the rights of fathers who have not legally established paternity (putative father’s rights); the right to appointed counsel in civil cases; and conflicts of law in putative father registries. Over 100 attorneys, judges, magistrates and law professors from across the country volunteered to judge the oral arguments and briefs filed by the teams.
The following law schools participated:
The 2007 National Champions in Child Welfare & Adoption Law are Krista Gundersen, who won the Best Oralist Award for the final round, and Vanessa Campagna, both law students from Seton Hall School of Law, Newark, NJ. In a closely contested competition, the runner-up team was Northern Kentucky University Salmon P. Chase College of Law, comprised of law students Ashley Baird, Megan Maxfield, and Scott Van Nice.
|
News & Events Archive |